Sunday, July 17, 2011

A new Great Game is evolving in Afghanistan

15.07.2011

In the 19th century, it was the Russians and the British who wrestled for influence in Afghanistan and Central Asia in a highly-explosive endeavor known as the Great Game.

 

Today, Afghanistan's natural resources are estimated to be worth billions of dollars. The resources in the neighboring Central Asian states are thought to be worth even more - the cake is huge and as yet largely untouched.

While the US and China want an especially large slice of it, neighboring states Iran, Pakistan, India and Russia all have their eyes on it as well. Most experts agree that a battle for natural resources is underway, alongside the war against terrorism.

 

 

Not enough has been done to define who has access to the natural resources, says Thomas Greven, a political scientist who teaches at Berlin's Free University.

 

"If conflict arises, in the worst-case scenario, it will not be sufficient to have contracts on exploiting natural resources. The access has to be secured via military bases, as well as political and security cooperation," says Greven.

 

Setting the tone

 

New roads built by the US and used by China New roads built by the US and used by ChinaThe US and China have been competing for the world's natural resources for at least a decade now. Both countries know that direct access to energy resources will determine who can maintain their wealth. Greven points out that the new Great Game in Central Asia will thus decide whether the 21st century ends up being Chinese or American.

 

"The US is not indifferent to the fact that there are natural deposits in Afghanistan," says Greven, adding that Washington would not be thrilled to see China take control of the war-torn state's natural resources without taking part in the fight against international terrorism.

 

The Chinese government has been conducting an offensive "shopping spree" in Afghanistan and other Central Asian states for some time now. To Washington's displeasure, Beijing was able to secure the exploitation rights for the region's biggest copper mine, by shelling out three billion dollars. Now, fully-laden trucks head from the mine in eastern Afghanistan to China on roads built by the Americans.

 

Officially, Beijing insists it does not have any great ambitions in Afghanistan and the region. But many observers think China at least wants to set the tone.

 

For Jürgen Stetten, the head of Asia at the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, the truth lies "somewhere in the middle."

 

"Even if it wanted to, China could not afford not to be a player in the geo-strategic game, including in Afghanistan," he says.

 

Avoiding direct confrontation


Until now, China has deliberately avoided direct confrontation with the US. The emerging superpower feels threatened by the 100,000 US soldiers in its direct vicinity. Stetten says Beijing is also concerned about the US' plans to maintain a presence in Afghanistan after 2014.

 

"Obviously China has no interest in being surrounded by US military bases," he says, adding however, that the situation does not look likely to change in the immediate future. This is why he thinks China is looking more at cooperating closely with Pakistan.

 

Beijing sees in Islamabad a loyal ally against India - its biggest rival in the region - and also thinks that with Pakistan's help it will better be able to consolidate its interests in Afghanistan, particularly after the US withdraws.

 

Stetten says that it is difficult to predict the outcome of the new Great Game in Afghanistan, but he believes it could very likely be catastrophic for Afghanistan. "A return of the Taliban, or proxy wars between the region's big rivals, China or India, or the US, could land the country in a conflict that it will not get out of for some time."

 

Author: Ratbil Shamel (act)
Editor: Sarah Berning



DW-World.de: Deutsche Welle

--
Shahzad Afzal
http://www.pakistanprobe.com/



Read More >>

Friday, July 1, 2011

US Rejects Demands to Vacate Pakistan Drone Base

US Rejects Demands to Vacate Pakistan Drone Base

By REUTERS
July 01, 2011 "Dawn" - -The United States is rejecting demands from Pakistani officials that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against suspected militants, U.S. officials told Reuters.
U.S. personnel have not left the remote Pakistani military installation known as Shamsi Air Base and there is no plan for them to do so, said a U.S. official familiar with the matter, who asked for anonymity to discuss sensitive material.
"That base is neither vacated nor being vacated," the official said. The information was confirmed by a second U.S. official.
The U.S. declaration that drone operations in Pakistan will continue unabated is the latest twist in a fraught relationship between security authorities in Washington and Islamabad, which has been under increasing strain for months.
Regarding the Shamsi base in particular, Pakistani officials have frequently suggested it is being shuttered, comments that may be aimed at quieting domestic opposition to U.S. military operations using Pakistani soil.
Earlier this week, Pakistani Defense Minister Ahmed Mukhtar told the Financial Times that Pakistan had already stopped U.S. drone operations there.
On Thursday, Mukhtar told Reuters: "When they (U.S. forces) will not operate from there, no drone attacks will be carried out."
He said Islamabad had been pressuring the U.S. to vacate the base even before the May 2 commando raid in which U.S. Navy SEAL commandos killed Osama bin Laden. After the raid, Mukhtar said, "We told them again."
A senior Pakistani military official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, added that when U.S. forces first launched counter-terrorism operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan "provided Americans two bases in Jacobabad and Shamsi. Jacobabad base has been vacated for long time ago, but Shamsi is still with them."
"They are vacating it," the official insisted. "Shamsi base was for logistic purpose. They also used it for drones for some time but no drones have been flown from there."
DIFFERENT STORIES
The official said no base in Pakistan was presently used by the Americans for drone operations. But he did not give a precise date for when drones supposedly stopped operating from Shamsi.
The U.S. officials disputed that account. If anything, the Obama administration is moving to a counter-terrorism strategy based more on drone strikes and other covert operations than on deploying large numbers of troops.
On Wednesday, John Brennan, president Barack Obama's top counter-terrorism advisor, promised that in the tribal regions along the Afghan/Pakistan border, the U.S. would continue to "deliver precise and overwhelming force against al Qaeda."
"And when necessary, as the President has said repeatedly, if we have information about the whereabouts of al Qaeda, we will do what is required to protect the United States -- as we did with bin Laden," Brennan said in a speech.
Pakistani officials have faced fierce criticism for tacitly allowing the CIA to conduct drone operations on Pakistani soil. Allegations that civilian bystanders have been killed in drone attacks have only compounded the political problems facing Pakistani authorities.
Brennan rejected suggestions that U.S. drone attacks had caused numerous civilian casualties, claiming that the U.S. had been "exceptionally precise and surgical" in its operations. "Not a single collateral death" had been caused by U.S. counter-terrorism operations over the last year, he said.
U.S. officials have said that since the United States in July 2008 greatly increased the rate of drone-borne missile strikes against suspected militants along the Afghan/Pakistan border, the number of civilian deaths caused by such attacks has totaled under 40. Some Pakistani officials and human rights activists have claimed the death toll is much higher.

 


--
Shahzad Afzal
http://www.pakistanprobe.com/



Read More >>

8 Radiation Sickness Signs

8 radiation sickness signs (Slideshow) 
By Deborah Dupre, Human Rights Examiner
June 18, 2011 3:28 pm ET 

..Due to nuclear assaults on the environment and life on it, humans are increasingly susceptible to irradiation poisoning them. Little information is being broadcasted about radiation sickness and its eight main signs. People who have been radiated often, therefore, attribute their new conditions to other than the actual cause, radiation.

http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/hash/a4/40/a440dea820081b338ac0322efae66d95.jpg 
The eight most common signs of radiation are:

1. Nausea and vomiting are typical early symptoms of radiation sickness. The higher the dose of irradiation, the faster they appear and the worse the overall prognosis. Irradiation is the process by which an item is exposed to radiation. 

If vomiting begins one hour after irradiation, death is probable. Very often, people who suffered radiation exposure first feel awful, but then improve. As a rule, however, more severe symptoms occur in a few hours, days or even weeks.

2. Nose bleeding often occurs with radiation sickness. Blood of the throat, bleeding gums or blood from the rectum are also signs that radiation has impacted the body. Bleeding bruises occur, sometimes hematemesis. The bleeding is caused by the radiation reducing the number of platelets that clot blood in the body.

3. Diarrhea, sometimes bloody: Burning, or "hits" are common. "Hits" along the body's cells that rapidly reproduce, including in the digestive tract cells. Irradiation causes irritation of the digestive organs that can cause diarrhea, sometimes bloody diarrhea.

Advertisement 
4. Severe sunburn appearance: Skin exposed to radiation can become red and covered with blisters as though strongly sunburned. In some cases, ulcers appear and in others, the skin may climb in round pattern.

5. Hair loss: One of the most common signs of radiation poisoning is hair loss, as cancer survivors note soon after radiation treatment. Radiation damages hair follicles so people being radiated usually oblyseet two or three weeks. In some cases, the hair loss is irreparable.

6. Fatigue and exhaustion: Radiation sickness causes weakness that feels similar to the flu and is often mistaken for "having the flu." Decreasing the number of red blood cells results in anemia and increased risk of fainting.

7. Mouth sores: Radiation sickness causes ulcers on lips or and in the mouth. Similar ulcers occur inside the esophagus, stomach and intestines.

8. Infection susceptibility: Radiation acts on white blood cells responsible for resisting infections, so people become more susceptible to viruses, bacteria and fungal diseases.

For free copies of Mr. Jeff Rense's ebook that he stated is "guaranteed to save lives," "Coming Clean, From Denial to Detox," see TriageTVNews.com. 

.

Continue reading on Examiner.com 8 radiation sickness signs (Slideshow) - National Human Rights | Examiner.com
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/eight-horrid-radiation-sickness-signs#ixzz1QjckWmb9
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/eight-horrid-radiation-sickness-signs#ixzz1PyIBKwWj


--
Shahzad Afzal
http://www.pakistanprobe.com/



Read More >>

Drama of Devolution under 18th Amendment

It is not surprising to note that despite high sounding drum-beating of 'Devolution of powers to Provinces' nothing has been practically devolved under 18th Amendment in respect of policy decisions, financial controls and regulatory powers.

 

Everybody knows that the ministries exercise their powers and functions through attached Departments / Organizations. Take example of Federal ministry of food and agriculture; the subject was a provincial matter even before the 18th Amendment but all policy matters, foreign aid/loan and regulatory functions were exercised by the Federation.

 

Now notionally the ministry has been devolved to provinces but the situation on the ground is still as under;

 

Sr.

Attached

Department /

Mega Project

Devolved

to

Provinces

Shifted to

Another Federal

Ministry

Remarks

1

Department of

Plant Protection

No

Yes

To Min of Commerce

 

2

Seed Certification

& Registration

Department

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

 

3

Pakistan Agricultural

Storage and Services

Corporation

No

Yes

To Min of

commerce

 

4

Pakistan Agricultural

Research Council

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

 

5

Pakistan Central

Cotton Committee

No

Yes

To Min of Textile

 

6

Pakistan Oilseed

Development Board

No

No

Closed

7

Soil Survey of

Pakistan

Yes

No

To

Punjab

8

Agriculture Policy

Institute

No

Yes to

Min of Planning

 

9

Economic Wing

No

Yes to

Min of Planning

 

10

WTO Cell

No

Yes to

Min of Econ. Affairs

 

11

Animal Quarantine

Department

No

Yes

To Min of Commerce

 

12

Federal Water

Management Cell

No

Yes

To Min of Power

 

13

Pakistan Tobacco

Board

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

 

14

Pakistan

Horticulture Board

No

Yes

To Min of Commerce

 

15

Mega Project

NAPHIS

No

Yes

To Min of Commerce

Rs 773

Million

16

Mega Project

Vegetable Hybrid

Seed Production

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 500

Million

17

Mega Project

Bio-saline

Agriculture

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 826

Million

18

Mega Project

Crop Maximization

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

Rs 8,013

Million

19

Mega Project

National Commercial

Seed Production

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 3,500

Million

20

Mega Project

Commercialization of

Tea Production

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 492

Million

21

Mega Project

Boosting Fodder

Availability

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 611

Million

22

Mega Project

Neelibar Agri. Res.

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

Rs 348

Million

23

Mega Project

Benazir Bhutto

Res. Station

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 916

Million

24

Mega Project

Pak China Coop

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

Rs 691

Million

25

Mega Project

Indigenization of

Hybrid Seed Prod

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 655

Million

26

Mega Project

Pak China Rice

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

Rs 433

Million

27

Mega Project

Pak China Cold

storage

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 2,229

Million

28

Mega Project

National Institute of

Genomics

No

Yes

To Min of

Science & Tech

Rs 482

Million

29

Mega Project

Water Conservation

No

Yes

To Min of Power

Rs 18,000

Million

30

Miscellaneous

Projects  

No

Yes to

Min of Sc. & Tech

 

 

Conclusion: It is evident that nothing is going to change after so called devolution and the ministry may be re-established with a new name within few days to continue business as usual. Chief Minister of Punjab has raised his concerns on the superficial process of devolution without handing over of assets and infrastructure in case of all devolved ministries. In return the movement of wheat from Punjab (to Balochistan and for export) through Sindh has been subjected to 'Private Tax' levied by private army of a sitting Sindh Minister.


Source:msarwar80@hotmail.com



--
Shahzad Afzal
http://www.pakistanprobe.com/



Read More >>